I like to track trends. The more info you can know about your campaigns and conversion rates, the better. Certain days have always seemed to have better conversion rates than others so I decided to run the numbers. I took a campaign that has been running for over 10 months and crunched the data to see which days of the week really converted best.

You can see that for this affiliate campaign, Fridays definitely converted best on average. The worst day of the week was Sunday. Keep in mind these numbers are conversion rates, which takes traffic volume out of the equation. What conclusions can be drawn from this? Maybe people are in the best moods on Fridays and want to buy stuff:)
(Note: this is NOT a paid review)
Every affiliate marketer needs good tools. So when I saw a promotional video for SpeedPPC, I was eager to test it out. After visiting their website I was a little nervous. It was one of those 1 long page, sales letter looking sites. Those are my pet peeve, and normally I would click right off, but I stuck with it and downloaded the program. Once I started going through all the materials, I was glad I did because this program is the real deal.
I think every affiliate marketer has come to Adbrite and been really excited at the possibilities. “You mean I can get a flat rate 1 week text ad for $1,750 that will bring me 28,000 clicks?!?! With the 5% conversion rate on my landing page that will be 1,400 conversions and at $15 a conversion that’s $19,250 pure profit!! Woohoo, I’m gonna be rich!” Unfortunately it doesn’t work out that way. You have many strikes working against you with these ads.
Of course, as with everything in affiliate marketing, you should always test it yourself to see what works and what doesn’t. Adrite’s flat rate ads may work for some purposes, like to increase brand awareness. But for the cut-throat world of driving traffic to CPA type offers we have found Adbrite ineffective.

With a PPC text ad, 4 lines are all you get to make your impression. Yet most people give little thought to the display URL, which is 25% of your ad’s real estate. The display URL should be a major concern when writing your ad. I would venture to say that it’s more important that your description even.
Buy a new domain:
This is one place not to cheap out and try to save a few bucks by using a bad domain name. Go ahead and register a new one, or even multiple new ones to test a new offer. Using an old domain that you had lying around, that kind of fits the offer is a recipe for failure. Besides, 1 conversion could recoup the domain cost for a year.
Buy a good domain:
For some reason I don’t have any trouble finding good domains. I never buy .NETs or .ORGs, only .COMS. I hardly ever use hyphens or weird punctuation either. Remember, you are buying the domain to instill confidence in the searcher, not for SEO purposes. Obviously, the shorter the better, but multiple related words are better than punctuation I find.
Test display URLs
I like to run multiple ad copies in Google with the only difference being the display URLs. I have seen big changes in CTR from various URLs tested. Once you find the best converting URL you can switch everything over to that URL.
It’s been said a million times before, you need to keep testing in affiliate marketing. You just never know what may or may not work until you actually commit some money to testing. We’ve all heard it before, but here’s an interesting case in point.
I was testing a campaign that has been running on Google for about 8 months now, just chugging along. I had 5 ads that I was testing for a particular Adgroup, and in one ad I noticed that I had accidentally left out a word in the description that made it read like total nonsense. It had ran that way for about 2 weeks and the funny thing is, that ad performed about 23% better than the other ads. I have no explanation for why that is, but you can bet I left that messed up ad in place
You really do need to think outside the box to be successful in affiliate marketing. Sometimes copying what others are doing does work, but that will only get you so far. To truly break out from the pack, you need to think differently about what you are doing.
Part of thinking outside the box, is constant testing. For me that means testing totally crazy stuff, because you never know what might hit. Sure, most of it will fail miserably, but occasionally you will get a winner.
Here’s a funny example of something I tested that was off the wall. I don’t like to give specifics of what is converting well from me, and what niches I am in (can you blame me?), but ringtones are always safe to talk about. Everyone does them. So I got to thinking about the standard boring, “pick your carrier” landing page that everyone uses. I asked myself what would be the opposite of this landing page? This is what I came up with.

Yes, that’s the whole landing page, no need to reload your browser. Just a white background with 2 small words. The amazing thing is, the bounce rate was about the same as the page I was running at the time! Conversions were a little lower probably due to a few lost carriers not supported by the offer it was going to, but surprisingly it worked pretty well. Since then I have hit on something that works way better, but at the time it worked great. I found my current landing page by “crazy” testing, just like this.
So get creative and stop following the pack!
When you are running a long term PPC campaign, ongoing testing is key. The hard part is to continue testing, even when you have an established and well running campaign. It’s easy to sit back and be satisfied with your ROI, but how do you know you aren’t leaving money on the table unless you continue to test? That’s what takes discipline, and if you have it you can separate yourself from the rest of you competitors.
This brings me to a task that I have started calling “pruning the trees”. I have this mental image of adgroups as branches on a tree, with the top performing ad texts as healthy branches shooting up. The bad performing ads are kind of scraggly branches growing off to the side. So just like if you want to keep a tree growing up, you have to prune off these side branches to let the good one keep growing up.
So for example, say you have an adgroup with 2 very strong ads pulling around 5% CTRs. Start throwing ads in there daily and let them run for a few days. Once you have this cycle going for a while, you can go in and prune out the bad ones, keeping the top ads in place. This will create a constant upward growth pressure on your adgroups. You are looking for that new ad that just may end up beating your top performers.
It’s important to note that by testing, you are going to use up some impressions on low performing ads, which would have otherwise gone to your top performers. That’s the cost of testing, but the rewards can exceed that cost if you hit on a great new ad copy.

One of the best ways to test the effectiveness of you landing pages is through Google Analytics Bounce Rate metric. This particular report can be found under content optimization, navigational analysis, entrance page bounce rates. With a bit of tweaking you can view a chart like this:

So what does this show? Well, like in golf, a lower number is better here. The lower the percentage, the more people are clicking through your landing page and taking the action you want them to. The higher the percentage, the more people are abandoning your landing page. In the example above, the landing page with the 46.3% rate is the most effective page, while the 76.5% page is pretty bad. This is a tremendously important way to gauge the effectiveness of your landing pages.
It’s also import because it gives you an even more detailed view than just conversion rate. For example if you have a 5% conversion rate, you still don’t know how many people are abandoning your landing page versus abandoning the affiliate offer page. By looking at bounce rate, you can tell not only the average rate that users click through your page, but also you now know how many users get all the way to the affiliate offer page then quit without buying. Pretty good stuff.