<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain strategies for PPC</title>
	<link>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/</link>
	<description>CDF Networks - Pay Per Click and Affiliate Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Split test everything &#124; CDF Networks - Affiliate Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-12009</link>
		<author>Split test everything &#124; CDF Networks - Affiliate Marketing Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-12009</guid>
		<description>[...] - I have talked before about the importance of testing multiple domains in your campaigns. The display URL is a critical part of your ad, and you never know what will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] - I have talked before about the importance of testing multiple domains in your campaigns. The display URL is a critical part of your ad, and you never know what will [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain strategies for PPC &#187; Mr.Cubo</title>
		<link>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-10195</link>
		<author>Domain strategies for PPC &#187; Mr.Cubo</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-10195</guid>
		<description>[...] Keep in mind, these strategies are for PPC to offer campaigns and are different that strategies for building a long term site. I am not factoring in brand building or SEO like you would if you were building an a site for organic results. article from:www.cdfnetworks.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Keep in mind, these strategies are for PPC to offer campaigns and are different that strategies for building a long term site. I am not factoring in brand building or SEO like you would if you were building an a site for organic results. article from:www.cdfnetworks.com [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-9078</link>
		<author>Chad</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-9078</guid>
		<description>For PPC, I would go with the keyword type domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For PPC, I would go with the keyword type domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-9073</link>
		<author>Dave</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-9073</guid>
		<description>Makes sense to me - "most" people looking in the Sponsored Links are buyers...and buyers are more likely to buy when they see .com.

- Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense to me - &#8220;most&#8221; people looking in the Sponsored Links are buyers&#8230;and buyers are more likely to buy when they see .com.</p>
<p>- Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-9072</link>
		<author>Chad</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-9072</guid>
		<description>Probably just another example of why testing is so important.  In all the niches I have split tested a .org its failed miserably.  But I can think of a few where it might work better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably just another example of why testing is so important.  In all the niches I have split tested a .org its failed miserably.  But I can think of a few where it might work better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-9069</link>
		<author>Lee</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-9069</guid>
		<description>All my natural search .orgs do really well... Personally, I think the most undervalued extension today is the .org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All my natural search .orgs do really well&#8230; Personally, I think the most undervalued extension today is the .org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-9058</link>
		<author>Fred</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-9058</guid>
		<description>Chad:

Any thoughts on short but meaningless domains, such as these false examples:
nifun.com
karad.com
bivap.com

As opposed to kw rich such as:
stopsmokingadvice.com
losingweightsolutions.com
ringtonesuperzone.com

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad:</p>
<p>Any thoughts on short but meaningless domains, such as these false examples:<br />
nifun.com<br />
karad.com<br />
bivap.com</p>
<p>As opposed to kw rich such as:<br />
stopsmokingadvice.com<br />
losingweightsolutions.com<br />
ringtonesuperzone.com</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-8996</link>
		<author>Chad</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cdfnetworks.com/domain-strategies-for-ppc/#comment-8996</guid>
		<description>I've found that some consumers dont really know what a .org is and are afraid to click on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found that some consumers dont really know what a .org is and are afraid to click on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
